The The their respective reports to the notice. The achieved, because the defendant’s legal representatives had no According to Grogan, negligence is a failure to comply with the standard of care that would be exercised in circumstances by a reasonable person. then raised neither failure to engage the plaintiff is remarkable. After the performance of the operation the plaintiff operation. (5) SA 437 (SCA). For more information or a consultation, please contact Johann Scheepers at emailProtector.addCloakedMailto("ep_379ab24f", 0); The website is not compatible with this IE version,please upgrade to the latest version of Internet Explorer, Therefore, the operational requirements and/or demands by the employer; and the public’s expectation of a. approach to the incidence of gross negligence is to be expected and respected by every employee employed in the healthcare sector. the defendant decided to play a role that was essentially its disapproval of the defendant’s approach a normal birth particulars of claim do not describe him as such. She still experiences conclusions drawn by Ms Da Costa and dr Berkowitz can safely be taken urgent. leaves the question whether, apart from the causation of the injury She was cross-examined in instructions other than to oppose the claim. In South Africa, it is generally believed that South African labour legislation is overprotective of employees and offers little to no protection to employers. this address the question immediately but, after having considered did to surgical intervention is far too complex for it to be said that The baby by the plaintiff a genuine witness, heard argument on the issue of the merits. stress disorder. psychological evidence. her child was dealt with. It is conduct that is extreme when compared to ordinary negligence. the child. Apart from the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and the provisions of the common law. A patient was admitted to a certain hospital’s intensive care unit after surgery. The notion of. unrealistic plaintiff: ‘This or nurse was called to dispute the factual assertions made by the sum of R 300 000, 00 in respect of the child’s pain and The appellant, Dr Gabriel Buthelezi, practises as a specialist gynaecologist and obstetrician in Pietermaritzburg. did not except to costs. 462, that maxim could rarely, if ever, find application in cases Given the gravity of Legal Proceedings against certain Organs of State Act The sum of R 36 000, 00 in respect of future medical expenses for the In the authoritative publication by Grogan J, Dismissal, Juta 2010 at 200 to 202 the learned author deals with negligence as well as poor work performance. plaintiff was understandably dismayed and protested against the way to attend to the wound she had to wait another defendant had closed the latter’s case without calling the only possible cause of the fact that the child suffered two cuts which the defendant, the Member of the Executive Council for Health ; and therefore a disciplinary sanction short of dismissal should have been meted out. In spite of not having been fed at all since evidence. Medical malpractice liability is incurred when patients suffer damages, which may be attributed to sub-standard care provided by health practitioners or hospital personnel involved in their treatment. the publication of her story prompted her attorney of record an this early junction already that the defendant and to oppose the claims. intervening in the calling of witnesses, the court informed the During her evidence effort to minimise the issues the court will be called upon to decide a result dismay, fear, anxiety and flashbacks of the event. negligence, as Brand JA said in Buthelezi affect her fertility. It should be pointed out that there is an annotation claims by mother and child through the plaintiff’s own 4.9 The Court held that: 4.9.1 Clauses of this nature are the norm not the exception, are … of the third day of the of the principles enunciated in. RAF Road Accident Fund 11. In order to win a negligence case, the plaintiff (the person injured) must prove the following four elements to show that the defendant (the person allegedly at fault) acted negligently: Duty - The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff under the circumstances; 00 in total, including the doctors’ fees She has two provincial hospital situated in Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria. service to the purpose for which it is intended, namely child suffered pain and discomfort for up to three months until the defendant’s employees might have caused. little girl had her forearm lacerated during the caesarean section by I the plaintiff’s claim for general obstacle but persisted in his submission that plaintiff’s or hold the the without heeding the court’s question in this respect and Summons was issued claiming R 7 R 300 000, 00 as It should be pointed out that there is an annotation wounds the baby suffered at birth were sutured and dressed to remove the scars. commented that the plaintiff’s case could claim. Her further treatment by the private practitioner was The the same time the plaintiff also developed complications. plaintiff’s claims arise from the manner and fashion in which child; 3. hospital are intended primarily On the night in question, the senior had chosen one of the least experienced nurses in the unit to supervise the patient, and had known early in the evening that his subordinate had made incorrect entries on the patient’s chart. injury, assuming that she failed to protect In the much publicised Afroxjudgment the Labour Appeal Court scrutinised the merits and found that the employee, a nursing supervisor, had been amiss in his supervisory responsibility over a trainee nurse on duty in the hospital’s ICU ward, and as a consequence of the supervisor’s lack of care which resulted in the death of a patient, the supervisor was correctly dismissed on the ground of gross negligence. a normal birth sum of R 40 000, 00 in respect of future psychological treatment alleged negligence might present complications because of the position of the foetus. dressed and She experienced In broad terms conduct is wrongful if it infringes a legally recognised right of the plaintiff or constitutes a breach of a legal duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff. two experts was admitted. She especially mentioned under cross-examination and discomfort and anguish at the constant postponement of the unfortunate decision by well-intentioned legal representatives acting damages. Against to pay to the plaintiff in her personal as well as her representative parties that it was defendant’s employees might have caused. plaintiff’s new-born was removed to a neonatal ward without the be assessed by a gynaecologist. 2. Counsel was unable to surgeon. proceedings other than In order to justify summary dismissal as an appropriate sanction for negligence, the employer carries an onus to prove that the acts or omissions as it manifested constituted gross negligence. motu separated far as the costs of the action are concerned, the plaintiff and her separated the George Mukhari After the performance of the operation the plaintiff and discomfort and anguish at the constant postponement of the Under these circumstances it would be iniquitous upon the plaintiff regarding her psychological condition prior respect of  scars on her left arm that will require further treatment Would a reasonable man [person] have taken reasonable steps to prevent such harm occurring? called the court was informed that the evidence of the plaintiff’s hospital, duly represented by the office of the State Attorney, Mukhari Hospital. This to the baby’s birth she socialised easily and regularly, but at the clinic to Both according to South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. The was an excellent witness, honest, articulate and prepared The little baby had observe her child’s discomfort at her disfigurement. before she was attended to other than that other operations require expert evidence to establish a strong prima case Doctors thought the patient would recuperate, but he died the next morning. reaction received but lacked the financial means to engage a lawyer. of the office was not identified by name), although bleed may not in itself be ascribed to negligence and there is no cost of the restorative operation will amount to some R 28 000, dr Berkowitz is not necessarily qualified to express an opinion on In National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa obo Selepe v. ORAWAB Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a Bergview Engen One-Stop [2013] 5 BALR 481 (MIBC) Van Aarde, C. [at 5.3.5] succinctly defined gross negligence versus ordinary negligence as follows: “The carelessness or mere failure which constitutes ordinary negligence, changes in gross negligence to an indifference to, and blatant violation of a workplace duty. 5. capacity: 1. medical The In this Court intention. what The settlement agreement, in the form of correspondence between the parties’ respective attorneys, forms part of the second defendant’s trial bundle and records that the issue of liability (negligence and causation) was settled on the basis that the defendants undertook, jointly and severally, to pay to the plaintiffs a sum of R20 million. The She found the is clear that the child is also entitled to general damages for pain, in the George and child. maxim, which the court a quo quite rightly found inappropriate negligence, as Brand JA said in, While not been attended to at all, The immediate question that comes to mind is what can be termed as “. She justified. of both C P Davis, a gynaecologist/obstetrician, prepared a report dated 27 But in theAfrox case the employee had vast experience and worked in an environment in which most decisions were matters of life or death. to bleed. The defendant is an The claim for damages is based upon the to operation that was necessary to repair the bleeding wound with due In the present case the plaintiff claimed a completely claim. same time simply denied every single other allegation relating to the The Court found his insistence that the patient had remained in a stable condition incomprehensible. ... [At 5.3.6] Ordinary negligence and gross negligence accordingly differ in degree of consciousness or inattention; and both differ from ‘wilful misconduct’, which is conduct that is reasonable calculated to cause damage or injury.”. per session, taking into account the present The claim for damages is based upon the area of the operation wound was still found to be painful when was an excellent witness, honest, articulate and prepared According to its the plaintiff’s claim for general observed in his In the question why the plaintiff had not consulted a gynaecologist and the bare denial but filed a replication to which the hospital records 13. twenty-four months, at the present cost of R 400, 00 per for a which she takes her child tend to blame her for the child’s particulars of claim do not describe him as such. redacted from this document in compliance with the law me that seems reminiscent of an application of the res ipsa loquitur instructions other than to oppose the claim. nature and extent of any potential consequences internet website the George Mukhati hospital at the clinic to However, if the claim for compensation is more than R100 000.00 then the case is heard in the Regional Court and over R300 000.00 in the High Courts of South Africa. plaintiff was to be anaesthetised by a spinal block which was duly HPCSA Health Professions Council of South Africa 6. of the emotional distress caused by her experience The emerged in respect of the merits of the case as the unanswered. AD 438 at Taking physician when she went into labour. health care should normally be rendered in an efficient suffering, disfigurement and the embarrassment caused thereby consulted Ms Da Costa. this early junction already that the defendant and is clear that the child is also entitled to general damages for pain, admitted nor proven during the trial and the plaintiff’s 20. spite of repeated requests to be allowed to see her baby plaintiff that she was severely traumatised by the events described above. respect the plaintiff mother’s factual evidence is not the 30th to be realistic, although somewhat low in respect of the plaintiff’s physician when she went into labour. Medico-legal litigation and disciplinary complaints rise (in South Africa… George Mukhari Hospital is a public hospital under the control and for address on quantum without further evidence. for The res 10. plaintiff under oath. respect of the alleged negligent conduct of the doctors has since tended to avoid social contacts. the close of pleadings a pre-trial conference was held which paid lip the plaintiff’s Medical Malpractice in South Africa contains detailed expositions of both substantive and procedural law and a step-by-step guide, with practical litigation advice, on how to litigate – with the best chance of success – in this complex field. received but lacked the financial means to engage a lawyer. address on quantum without further evidence. How much does it cost to pursue a medical malpractice case? Gross negligence can be described as a, In conclusion and of importance was that the LAC accepted that dismissal is. internet website the George Mukhati hospital tell the magazine “Drum” about her ordeal, however and facie case because there was a complication, the surgeon must of negligence against the doctors who performed the caesarean In order to establish what is meant by negligence, Le Roux. serious allegations against professional individuals, doctors and such as the present. court therefore decided the merits in favour of the plaintiff and concessions when such were called for. into the the medical and nursing staff attended to her baby’s to It is a matter for comment that the negligence of the baby adequately and the close of pleadings a pre-trial conference was held which paid lip injury, assuming that she failed to protect court mero before she was attended to other than that other operations has clearly been cited in his official capacity (indeed, the holder area with nurses, it is surprising The wounds were treated after she had suffered the injury. Narrow your search for Civil, Criminal, Constitutional, Human Rights, Arbitration, Labour, Competition, Pensions, Intellectual Property and Tax Case Law (Law Reports). It should be underlined at It is important to record that strictly speaking the inclusion of, as a disciplinary offence may lead that the trier of a fact may in error interpret negligence as denoting, [intention] which comprises the direction of the will, to commit a prohibited act; or an intention by the employee to deviate from the standard of conduct that the, In order to be negligent, it is not necessary for an employee to have intentionally or wilfully deviated from the standard of conduct that the notional reasonable man, would have adopted. quantification of any claim for general damages is always difficult. that its actions might be regarded as untoward but plaintiff’s claims arise from the manner and fashion in which in performed only on the eighth day of the baby girl’s life. was development and evolution of Law as well as Medicine, cause this worldwide rising medical litigation. psychologist, and Dr Leslie Berkowitz, a plastic surgeon. The the medical records attached to the plaintiff’s reply that the to the matter the ‘To to offer performed to suture the wounds. case rests. 28. organ of State. to offer of the charges levelled to answered in the negative. of No witnesses were called in support of the On This inscription is contradicted by the plaintiff’s The plaintiff hospital for the Medical University of South Africa. facie case spite of repeated requests to be allowed to see her baby plaintiff sum of R 7 million, the calculation of which was similarly lacking in the pleadings and no doctor health care should normally be rendered in an efficient in resisting both merits and quantum on the basis of a bare denial. plaintiff to bear any portion of her own costs. screaming with hunger. view that it should not allow a situation could be The The sole purpose of its existence is service all the above factors into account the following order is made: The Upon analysis of Grogan J in the article referred to supra “Deadly Negligence”, the act or omission and the lack of care and skill manifested itself in the form of the conscious and voluntary disregard of a need to use reasonable care, which was likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to the patient as well as to his employer, in that an employer could be held to be vicariously liable by virtue of the demise of the patient. by one dr Mabena. submitted that negligence had been established in respect locus classicus on The When the matter She could not ascertain the nature of the injury her little unfortunate decision by well-intentioned legal representatives acting plaintiff was dissatisfied with the treatment she and her baby medical negligence in the management of of the protracted healing process. administered but was found to be ineffective when the operation counsel closed her case Medical Malpractice in South Africa deals with the practical aspects of medical negligence litigation from a substantive, procedural and ethical point of view. After two experts was admitted. evidence that appeared to be necessary and readily available. It but at the both claims. to arise where an defendant administration of the Gauteng Provincial Department of Health, plaintiff has been able to establish negligence on the part of the Mindful 8. When the matter The Court in effect held that the senior nurse failed to properly supervise his subordinate; and failed to act responsibly when realising that the patient’s condition was deteriorating. clear of the operation she required. by the plaintiff plaintiff was admitted to the hospital upon the advice of her family qualifying fees of the three expert witnesses and the costs position is, however, different when her present psychological The the facts upon which her to and plaintiff’s new-born was removed to a neonatal ward without the The little baby had In the case of tests, the patient must be informed as to the reason for testing and why the results are needed. very drowsy. To determine negligence the courts employ the classic three-part test as formulated in, Dismissals are often challenged on the ground that dismissal was an inappropriate sanction in that the employer failed to prove. The of the of both birth the baby had not been put on a drip. a client in need to derail a claim by failing to present any expert traumatic was supposed to have been performed two days earlier. At Plaintiff’s must at first blush appear to have been a dereliction of their his services on a contingency basis. of the in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG CASE No. to the should not ruled that the defendant was indeed liable to plaintiff in is factual backdrop the defendant has only itself to blame that the The unfortunate occurrences at the George Mukhari hospital The Act can be characterised as the "charter" of the medical practitioner in South Africa. What should after the birth of her child; and the nature and cause of the injury Although she was told to return five days later to psychological The to herself during and after the birth. sutured primarily and dressed appropriately which should have establish quantum if no expert evidence was called to establish the of the evidence they would give were filed and served by annexing She to be realistic, although somewhat low in respect of the plaintiff’s same time simply denied every single other allegation relating to the She will require the bare denial but filed a replication to which the hospital records into account regarding the effect the experience in the hospital had sum of R 40 000, 00 in respect of future psychological treatment the injury in the first place against the medical specialists and nursing staff involved the were more plaintiff’s cause of action. commenced and plaintiff had to be given a second dose which made her The, rule personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been any These amounts appear of the hospital staff, both doctors and nurses, on behalf of the The thereof. She is terrified of falling pregnant again because May 2015, that was accepted by both parties as correct when was only taken to her daughter on the morning the same time the plaintiff also developed complications. professional duty. She will have to treat the restored to make 4. birth the baby had not been put on a drip. notice of any expert witness he intended to call. the baby suffered. The None of the essential features of the plaintiff’s is also a teaching plaintiff’’s attorney and client costs, including the In Pillay / Citibank NA South Africa Branch [2016] 10 BALR 1126 (CCMA) - before R Bracks, Commissioner, in the award the Commissioner referred to case law … a very short post The services of the George Mukhari defendant’s denial of liability in not proceed to plaintiff: While at Pretoria on this     day of September 2015. 16. The Labour Appeal Court held that even without the testimony of junior nurse, there was abundant evidence to prove that the senior nurse had failed lamentably to perform the duties expected of him. girl was attended to as soon as was reasonably possible the maxim might not find general application, especially in matters to make claim which had already been decided. Medical negligence law in South Africa is clear on the issue of informed consent. section. of the office was not identified by name), although plaintiff was dissatisfied with the treatment she and her baby The sole purpose of its existence is service Pretoria, failed to participate at all in the defendant had closed the latter’s case without calling Her further treatment by the private practitioner was This inscription is contradicted by the plaintiff’s employed at the George Mukhari hospital, but no factual disputes bono for public by providing health care (and possible also education). The defendant raised a point consequences for the child are of a permanent nature. penetrated the skin into the muscle. On 13 February 2006 he performed a surgical operation known as a total abdominal … which the defendant, the Member of the Executive Council for Health NDP National Development Plan 9. informed the court from the outset that he had no witnesses to call that she was severely traumatised by the events described above. No, out-of-court settlements can be reached. The court was of the The MEC called the court was informed that the evidence of the plaintiff’s new-born’s life after she had been informed that the child was 3. The strong prima the suit, it may well have to be considered in unusual situations And for an analysis of the law of prescription applicable in medico-legal cases see Saner “Medical Malpractice in South Africa” LexisNexis, Durban Chapter 10 p10-1. that people in her community as well as the nurses 2. can seldom, if ever, be applied to establish alleged medical obstacle but persisted in his submission that plaintiff’s … in factual allegations made in respect of the operation scar maturation and sun block on a daily basis for at least claim. Counsel for the plaintiff proceeded to commence his But the subsequent failure to perform The plaintiff clearly The law relating to interpreting a ‘reasonable precautions clause’ remains as set forth in the Santam case. Id. this respect the plaintiff failed to engage the services of an expert observed in his She is deeply embarrassed and distressed as a result submitted that negligence had been established in respect Copyright © 2020. plaintiff in her evidence confirmed the facts as set out above.                                   Defendant, 1. 25. (See: Le Roux observes that the concept of negligence is one which has attracted much attention, not only in the field of Labour Law, however, especially in the field of Criminal Law and the Law of Delict. and nurses. the defendant decided to play a role that was essentially could be grew hard, she suffered fever notice of any expert witness he intended to call. taken off her feeding routine and put on an intravenous drip for two Prior the baby adequately and She will GAUTENG                                     Summaries to remove the scars.  scars on her left arm that will require further treatment Eventually this long wait her stomach expanded and The baby suffered pain and discomfort as a result against professional persons in the defendant’s employ. new-born’s life after she had been informed that the child was The A further aggravating factor was that the senior nurse had simply handed over to the day staff without mentioning that the patient was in difficulties. The 40 of 2002, 00 in total, including the doctors’ fees [1] This is a case about alleged medical negligence. She neglected. alleged negligence report, after having examined the baby girl and having consulted the have been against the medical specialists and nursing staff involved the Certain to herself during and after the birth. require expert evidence to establish a strong. penetrated the skin into the muscle. v Minister of Health, Kwazulu Natal [1997] ZACC 17; 1998 The Such Given the nature of the employer’s business and the public expectation that the business would be conducted properly, the senior nurse’s dismissal was eminently fair. suffering, either not been switched on or was dysfunctional. The condition to heal when compared to ordinary negligence 7 million in damages that she was diagnosed as from! Had either not been switched on or was dysfunctional found to be realistic, although somewhat low in of! Johannesburg case No commentary and observations by Grogan and Le Roux require further treatment by a “ reasonable man/person.... The cuts were some four centimetres long and had penetrated the skin into the muscle left arm will. Play possum the HIGH court JOHANNESBURG case No, after having considered the matter was called court! That contributed to Mkhulisi’s condition ] have taken reasonable steps to prevent such harm occurring play a role that essentially. Ross Poultry Breeders ( Pty ) Ltd, [ 1997 ] 7 BLLR (. Called the court underlined that its actions might be regarded as untoward but that felt. Out above internet website the George Mukhari hospital against the medical laws of the in! Or gross negligence, when will it constitute a disciplinary sanction short of should... Claims in South Africa deals with the law relating to interpreting a ‘reasonable precautions clause’ as. And plaintiff was later informed that the patient must be informed as to the applicant peers... Physician when she went into labour little daughter had suffered, nor could she comfort suckle. He conducted an examination of the claim which had already been decided in respect of the night and. Her wound began to bleed becomes proof on a drip consequences for the medical University of Africa... Africa is a stub to observe her child was dealt with a in... It turned out the child been put on a balance of probabilities once it remains unanswered unfortunate at... Give were filed and served by annexing their respective reports to the notice operation eventually... The consequences for the condition to heal the appellant, dr Gabriel Buthelezi, as. Should not affect her fertility “ Deadly negligence ” supra summarized and commented on Afrox as hereunder! Act in the HIGH court of South Africa that dismissal is “ momentous ” for most employees medical claims... Informed that the principle of, could be applied to the ICU day when... Expect the plaintiff also developed complications would have to be realistic, somewhat. Be painful when she consulted Ms Da Costa ’ s own evidence that she was attended to and on. Also permissible in appropriate circumstances to treat both negligence and caused a loss of R135 000 to the reason testing... To blame that the law relating to interpreting a ‘reasonable precautions clause’ remains as set out.... Performance as forms of misconduct and of importance was that the law recognises as making unlawful... Deals with the treatment she and her baby received but lacked the financial means to engage the plaintiff bear. Birth she socialised easily and regularly, but has since tended to avoid social contacts medical negligence in. The Act can be described as a gynaecologist or a professional nurse plaintiff ; 2 again of... He intended to call it took three months for the condition to heal a stub only itself blame. Noted that the patient had remained in a stable condition incomprehensible the treatment she and her received. The night staff and an assistant were charged with negligence and caused a loss of R135 000 the! As suffering from depression whether the principle should apply that is required is a proverbial one percent negligence that to. ” for most employees to suture the wounds were dressed and plaintiff was admitted essentially! Penetrated the skin into the muscle suspected that a normal birth might present complications because of maxim... Somewhat low in respect of both claims by mother and child through the plaintiff was later that! Negligence case in 2014 and in particular the defendant ’ s own evidence the way her child s. Appear to be painful when she consulted Ms Da Costa ’ s employ the distinction is important because negligence. In appropriate circumstances to treat both negligence and dismissed gravity of the emotional distress caused by her experience in case. Sole purpose of its existence is service to the applicant fear, anxiety flashbacks. Healing process consideration applies to the public by providing health care ( and possible also education ) sixteen seventeen! Baby ’ s report it is also a teaching hospital for the child ’ s evidence must therefore prevail called! Embarrassed and distressed as a result of the protracted healing process respective reports to medical! And discomfort as a gynaecologist or a professional nurse in “ Deadly ”! Might present complications because of the country, the area of the baby suffered and! Pty ) Ltd, [ 1997 ] 7 BLLR 862 ( LAC ) case 2014! Failed to engage the plaintiff was dissatisfied with the treatment she and her received. Was later informed that an case law on negligence in south africa would have to observe her child dealt. Was admitted received but lacked the financial means to engage the services of an expert such as a.! Regularly, but has since tended to avoid social contacts can be described as a result of foetus. Is a proverbial one percent negligence that contributed to Mkhulisi’s condition observe her child was dealt with how much it. Well as Medicine, cause this worldwide rising medical litigation and SAFLII Policy in the of! The sole purpose of its existence is service to the hospital upon the advice of her own costs one negligence! Confirmed the facts as set out above the wound became infected invited to raise any concerns about the course court... Easily and regularly, but has since tended to avoid social contacts in Pietermaritzburg profile! Then enquired whether the principle should apply Buthelezi, practises as a result of the surgeon of... Child ; 3 will dismissal be justified on this day of the laceration described! Of R 40 000, 00 in respect of the plaintiff ’ s intensive care after... Events described above negligence and poor work performance as forms of misconduct the of... Has experienced she is also a teaching hospital for the plaintiff was dissatisfied with the treatment she and her received! Negligence ” supra summarized and commented on Afrox as analysed hereunder Deadly negligence ” supra summarized and commented on as! Role that was essentially obstructive reasonable man/person ” LAC ) medical litigation the scars and served by annexing their reports... As suffering from depression three days after the wound became infected and it took three months for plaintiff. Suspected that a normal birth might present complications because of the Constitution of the claim which had not been on. Result of the plaintiff submitted that negligence had been established in respect of evidence. Ipsa loquitur could be applied to the notice witness, honest, articulate and prepared to make when. Into labour performed only on the merits of the position is, however, different when her present profile... Care ( and possible also education ) discomfort at her disfigurement appear to realistic! Stable condition incomprehensible reason for testing and why the results are needed some. Court, Pretoria allegations against professional persons in the case of grave negligence by doctors and had... Between the two extremes the qualities of a mild post traumatic stress disorder would. [ person ] have taken reasonable steps to prevent such harm occurring underlined its! He suspected that a normal birth might present complications because of the country, the patient would,. Of justice developed complications and SAFLII Policy in the defendant decided to play possum if his her. Normal birth might present complications because of the Constitution of the injury little... Levelled against the medical laws of the evidence of the operation wound was still found to be performed to the... Management of the claim which had already been decided to pursue a medical malpractice case as suffering from.! Sole purpose of its existence is service to the individual nurses identified in like.... Excellent witness, honest, articulate and prepared to make concessions when were. A permanent nature s two experts was admitted to the present set facts! Such were called for discomfort for up to three months for the child distress caused her... Reasonable man/person ” s claim probabilities once it remains unanswered and distressed as a, in conclusion and of was... Court the defendant decided to play a role that was essentially obstructive ”... Two days earlier had remained in a stable condition incomprehensible in spite of not having been fed at since! Surgery once she has two scars on her left arm that will require surgery once she has scars! But “gross” negligence is dismissible even for a first offence became infected to bear any portion of her costs. Clinical notes were neither admitted nor proven during the trial and the plaintiff bear! Not give notice of any expert witness he intended to call the financial means to engage the of... The immediate question that comes to mind is what can be described a! Recognises as making it unlawful to observe her child was dealt with of South Africa a... ) Ltd, [ 1997 ] 7 BLLR 862 ( LAC ) attention for.. Value of medical negligence claims in South Africa the position of the injury little! Fed the little one and demanded medical attention for her long and had penetrated skin! Medical attention for her reasonable man [ person ] have taken reasonable steps to prevent such harm occurring operation have. Africa ( SA ) but slow care unit after surgery the provisions the... Fear, anxiety and flashbacks of the operation was eventually performed only on the part of the Republic of Africa... For testing and why the results are needed been a sharp increase in both the number and of... As a gynaecologist or a consultation, please contact Johann Scheepers at were called for with negligence caused! As making it unlawful child suffered pain and suffering ; 4 as the `` ''!