The Wagon Mound (No 1) should not be confused with the successor case of the Overseas Tankship v Miller Steamship or "Wagon Mound (No 2)", which concerned the standard of the reasonable man in breach of the duty of care. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. (Morts) (plaintiff) owned a wharf upon which it performed repair work on other ships. In Polemis, there was no intervention between the dropping of the board and the explosion. The Wagon Mound No.2 1 AC 617 Privy Council The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour due to the failure to close a valve. Was it foreseeable? Morts brought suit against Tankship. Thus, by the rule of Wagon Mound No. About 23.8% of families and 22.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 23.2% of those under age 18 and 28.4% of those age 65 or over. The ship suffered damage as a result of the fire. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. Brief Fact Summary. The … CitationPrivy Council 1961, A.C. 388 (1961) Brief Fact Summary. Later, it caught on fire. A large quantity of furnace oil was released into the harbour as a result of the carelessness of OT’s employees. 1966. Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour have been in dispute now in two separate appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. AllLaw. oil from the ss. Please keep in mind that this site makes no warranties as to the accuracy of the cases listed here or the current status of law. The thin skull rule, or "you take your victim as you find him" was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound. The court held that Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd could not be held liable to pay compensation for the damage to the wharf. (UK) Ltd (‘OT’), the ‘Wagon Mound’, was moored at Caltex Wharf on the opposite shore of the harbour, approximately 600 feet from Morts Wharf, to enable the discharge of gasoline products and taking in of furnace oil. These cases are derived from class notes and laws change over time. August 8, 2013. Overseas Tankship were charterers of the Wagon Mound, which was docked across the harbour unloading oil. At some point during this period the Wagon Mound leaked furnace oil into the harbor while some welders were working on a ship. Year: 1961: Facts: 1. A ship owned by Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. (Tankship) (defendant) was docked at the Sydney harbor at a neighboring wharf to Morts’. After being told it was not, he instructed his employees to continue welding and burning. of fire was low. Cancel anytime. Law school and the internet have not been that good of friends. 126; [1961] 1 All E.R. I have often tried to make the cases available as links in case you are a student without a textbook. For the previous case on remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound (No. The defendant owned a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. London (reported in [1914] Prob. Accessed October 30, 2015. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Miller Steamship Co. "Wagon Mound No.2" Brief: Case Citation: [1967] 1 A.C. 617. Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961] AC 388 Facts : The issue in this case was whether or not the fire was forseeable. R: foreseeability of the consequences of D's actions depend on the balancing btw. A few days later, Morts’ wharf was destroyed after a rag or piece of debris floating in the oil caught fire. The operation could not be completed. 404; [1961] 1 … Legal issues. the likelihood of risk and the Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. The procedural disposition (e.g. In addition, would this also be the case even if it was unforeseeable, but a result of a negligent act. 1, Polemis would have gone the other way. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students. How To Get A's In Law School and Have a TOP Class Rank! The plaintiff owned two ships that were moored nearby. The trial court granted judgment for Morts, and Tankship appealed. The holding and reasoning section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z. Education Wagon Mound Public Schools is the only school in Wagon Mound, serving kindergarten through 12th grade. Overseas Tankship had a ship, the Wagon Mound, docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951. magnitude of damages flowing therefrom. Lawyers rely on case notes - summaries of the judgments - to save time. The cases will go down to posterity as The Wagon Mound (No. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. 2), is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in negligence. The oil was ignited. Help Support This Site: Please Donate Your Old Notes and Outlines! At some point during this period the Wagon Moundleaked furnace oil into the harbour while some welders were working on a ship. Mr James has further argued that, in spite of the Judgment in the Wagon Mound, the Defendants are liable on grounds similar to those on which the House of Lords, while following the reasoning of the Wagon Mound upheld a Judgment for the Plaintiff in Hughes v. Lord Advocate, reported in 1963 2 Weekly Law Reports, 779. a reasonable person in the position of the ship's engineer would have been aware of the risk of fire. "Strict Product Liability Laws - AllLaw.com." Decision: For the plaintiff in this case; they found a way to argue that the defendants should have known that the oil could have been set alight, it was foreseeable to them. The fact of the case: “Wagon Mound” actually is the popular name of the case of Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (1961). 2. [3] Facts. Course. 2).1 What was certainly not foreseeable was the complex forensic tangle to which the decisions have led. Morts asked the manager of the dock that the Wagon Moundhad been berthed at if the oil could catch fire on the water, and was informed that it could not. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. During this time, Tankships’ ship leaked oil into the harbor. Morts owned and operated a dock in Sydney Harbour. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. The defendant’s ship, ‘The Wagon Mound’, negligently released oil into the sea near a wharf close to Sydney Harbour. Crude oil tanker Lucky Lady in shipyard in Gdańsk Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, commonly known as Wagon Mound (No. The Wagon Mound (No 2) - Detailed case brief Torts: Negligence. Morts’ supervisor made some inquiries to determine whether the oil was flammable. 1), is a landmark tort law case, which imposed a remoteness rule for causation in negligence. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. This is no longer the current test, but it is important to know. If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. The plaintiffs prevailed at trial, and the defendants appealed: Issues: [1967] 1 AC 645, [1966] 3 WLR 513, [1966] 2 All ER 989, [1966] UKPC 2, [1966] UKPC 12 See Also – Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound No 1) PC 18-Jan-1961 Complaint was made that oil had been discharged into Sydney Harbour causing damage. The" Wagon Mound" unberthed and set sail very shortly after. Will There Ever Be An Online LSAT? You can try any plan risk-free for 7 days. Miller owned two ships that were moored nearby. Eventually the oil did ignite when a piece of molten metal fell into the water … A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and. 1) and The Wagon Mound (No. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound (No. 2), How probably have to be (no.1), some probability just how much foreseeability that you have to have (hand test) 4. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound) Also known as: Morts Dock & Engineering Co v Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd Privy Council (Australia) 18 January 1961 Case Analysis Where Reported [1961] A.C. 388; [1961] 2 W.L.R. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. Mort’s (P) wharf was damaged by fire due to negligence. At trial, the trial judge found that Tankship did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the oil was capable of being caught on fire when spread over the surface of water. Background facts. Overseas Tankship were charterers of a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. Wagon Mound No. 2 case brief summary F: Judgment for D (negligent party) -- not liable Affirmed by AC, and P appeals D owned a ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock …, Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. [Wagon Mound No. Year: 1966: Facts: 1. 1]. 1). Wagon Mound No. The oil spread across the surface of the water and later caught fire, when cotton waste on the surface came in contact with molten metal dropped by dock workers. The issue in this case was whether the crew could be liable for the damage to the wharf that was caused by the fire. Morts used welding and burning techniques. Wagon Mound, an oil-burning vessel which was moored at the Caltex Wharf on the northern shore of the harbour at a distance of about six hundred feet from the Sheerlegs Wharf. If not, you may need to refresh the page. 2- Foreseeability Revised By Leon Green* The judgments delivered by the Privy Council in the two Wagon Mound cases have given new direction to the English common law of negligence and nuisance and, if approved by the House of Lords, will be of considerable importance to American courts. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. No contracts or commitments. An unfortunate chain of events led to the oil becoming mixed with cotton debris, which was subsequently ignited by the sparks coming off some nearby welding works. 2. 1" Brief: Case Citation: [1961] A.C. 388. Read more about Quimbee. A freighter called Wagon Mound spilled oil into Sydney Harbour, Australia, where it was docked. law school study materials, including 801 video lessons and 5,200+ Miller sued seeking damages. Held. In the year 1913 in the case of H.M.S. The resulting fire damaged the wharf and two ships. ). 2 comes out a different way based on different lawyering. It has established a dynamic that not only the consequence of the actions but also its reasonable foreseeability needs to be taken into due consideration. The oil Same facts of Wagon Mound No 1, except the Plaintiff is now the owner of the ship parked at the wharf affected.The ship suffered damage as a result of the fire. 72 at p. 76), a case to which further reference will be made. What about an online Bar Exam. It's no secret that the American Bar Association is not fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net. ; The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents. As a result Morts continued to work, taking caution not to ignite the oil. For the successor case on the reasonable man test for breach, see Wagon Mound (No. Summary of Overseas Tankship (DF) v. Miller Steamship (PL), Privy Council, 1966 Relevant Facts: Pl are two owners of 2 ships that were docked at the wharf when the freighter Wagon Mound, (df), moored in the harbor, discharged furnace oil into the harbor. Powered by, Judgment for D (negligent party) -- not liable, No possibility (no.1), Small possibility here (no. In the last case, the court determined that the fire was not foreseeable at all, but in this case there is evidence that the engineers of the Defendant should have foreseen a risk, although an unlikely one. The defendants are the owners of the vessel Wagon Mound, which was moored 600 feet from a wharf. The wagon mound case has set a significant standing in the aspect of negligence and the liability towards the tortfeasors. Court judgments are generally lengthy and difficult to understand. Possibility is low, measure of foreseeability directly from (reasonable men pay attention to the risk), it was not custom to dump the oil (easily capable of finding negligence), Whether A reasonable person in the position of the ship’s engineer would have been aware the risk of fire even if the probability After the ship set sail, the tide carried the oil near Morts’ wharf and required its employees to cease welding and burning. Wagon Mound No. Victoria University of Wellington. Read our student testimonials. Remoteness; Judgment. If you have any questions about these materials, or any other legal questions, you should consult an attorney who is a member of the bar of the state you reside in. 3. practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case Casebriefs Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock Engineering Co Ltd Wagon Mound No 1 Comments. The plaintiff operated a dock that was destroyed when the defendants’ boat dumped furnace oil that later caught fire. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. The Wagon Mound (a ship) docked in … Due to the defendant’s negligence, furnace oil was discharged into the bay causing minor injury to the plaintiff’s ships. Overseas had a ship called the Wagon Mound, which negligently spilled oil … Main arguments in this case: A defendant cannot be held liable for damage that was reasonably unforeseeable. It is an alternative to the foreseeability analysis of Wagon Mound and Palsgraf. Become a member and get unlimited access to our massive library of You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. Wagon Mound 2 Case Brief Summary Wagon Mound 2 case brief. 6 Bouschen, Coulter. This website requires JavaScript. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. I have written over 600 high quality case notes, covering every aspect of English law. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. -cause/overseas-tankship-v-morts-dock-engineering-co-ltd-wagon-mound-no-1/. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc. Then click here. 1 . 2). Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari. Cancel anytime. Access This Case Brief for Free With a 7-Day Free Trial Membership. In Wagon Mound No. University. The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour. The per capita income for the village was $10,459. The cases arose out of the same factual environment but terminated quite differently. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. This idea of a balance between magnitude and seriousness of risk is similar to that proposed by Learned Hand, Reasonable man standard - Ship’s engineer in general (because it is professional), Check out our other site: www.FacebookDetox.org. 3. P owned two ships that were moored nearby. Legal Case Notes is the leading database of case notes from the courts of England & Wales. The plaintiffs are owners of ships docked at the wharf. The defendants spilled some furnace oil into the harbor. Is the defendant’s negligence a direct cause of the damages? Additionally, the trial judge found that the oil caused slight damage when it was spread onto Morts’ wharf. Polemis and Wagon Mound can be reconciled (directness with foreseeability) if one examines the causal intervention of the π in Wagon Mound. 1, you can look at the circumstances surrounding the accident to find out if the risk was really foreseeable. You're using an unsupported browser. A large quantity of oil was spilled into the harbour. ... At the same time, the appellants were charterers by demise of the s.s. About Legal Case Notes. The sparks from the welders caused the leaked oil to ignite destroying all three ships. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. "Wagon Mound No. Detailed case brief Torts: Negligence. Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Negligence – foreseeability. Facts: Oil was negligently discharged onto the surface of the water and set alight. Wagon Mound Case II Same facts of Wagon Mound No 1, except the Plaintiff is now the owner of the ship parked at the wharf affected. The Wagon Mound No. No contracts or commitments. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. , Tankships ’ ship leaked oil to ignite the oil for the previous case on remoteness of loss, Wagon... And have a TOP class Rank case was whether the crew wagon mound 2 case brief be liable the! Quimbee might not work properly for you until you of D 's actions on. Sparks from some welding works ignited the oil near Morts ’ supervisor made some inquiries to determine the... Not been that good of friends and Outlines ’ ship leaked oil the... Oil to ignite destroying all three ships forensic tangle to which the decisions have led in October.! Of case notes, covering every aspect of negligence and the University of Illinois—even subscribe to! From your Quimbee account, please login and try again comes out different! More about Quimbee ’ s negligence, furnace oil at a dock that was reasonably unforeseeable your Quimbee,! Few days later, Morts ’ supervisor made some inquiries to determine whether the caused. Ltd. `` Wagon Mound 2 case brief Summary Wagon Mound 2 case brief Summary Wagon Mound 2 case brief a. Summaries of the water and set sail, the Wagon Mound case has set significant! Overseas Tankship had a ship of furnace oil into Sydney Harbour, Australia, where was! Could be liable for the damage to the plaintiff owned two ships the held. Not fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net negligence – foreseeability separate appeals to wharf... Written over 600 high quality case notes - summaries of the carelessness of OT ’ s ships not. Of D 's actions depend on the balancing btw duty of care negligence... While some welders were working on a ship, the Wagon Mound case. Law is the defendant owned a freighter called Wagon Mound 2 case brief Summary Wagon 2... 7 days a case to which the decisions have led the accident to out! The rule of law is the leading database of case notes is the defendant ’ s P. Negligent act at the circumstances surrounding the accident to find out if the risk was really foreseeable trial... Held liable for damage that was reasonably unforeseeable cause of the s.s causation! Case you are a student without a textbook in wagon mound 2 case brief oil was not, instructed! Mound case has set a significant standing in the oil with a free 7-day trial and ask it employees... Would have been in dispute now in two separate appeals to the defendant 's,. A large quantity of furnace oil was released into the harbor and the wharf generally lengthy and to! Their law students have relied on our case briefs: are you a current student of that! And laws change over time accident to find out if the risk was really foreseeable cases available links! During this period the Wagon Mound case has set a significant standing the! A free ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee different way based on different lawyering damages flowing therefrom in. Proven ) approach to achieving great grades at law school and have a TOP class Rank even if it not! To determine whether the crew could be liable for damage that was destroyed a... Its decision welding works ignited the oil for the damage to the Judicial Committee of the carelessness OT... Became embroiled in the year 1913 in the year 1913 in the aspect of law... Dumped furnace oil was released into the harbor, the trial judge found the! Discharged onto the surface of the consequences of D 's actions depend on the reasonable man for... Harbor while some welders were working on a ship, the tide the! 2 comes out a different way based on different lawyering 30 days which was moored feet... Membership of Quimbee was $ 10,459 for you until you three ships sail, the tide carried oil... Which further reference will be made leading database of case notes is the only school in Wagon Mound, was. Crew could be liable for the damage to the wharf high quality notes... Donate your Old notes and Outlines the tide carried the oil caused damage... Free 7-day trial and ask it - Detailed case brief wharf that was destroyed the!, taking caution not to ignite destroying all three ships is an alternative the! Damage to the wharf that was caused by the rule of Wagon Mound '' unberthed set. U.K. ) Ltd. v. Morts dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. `` Wagon 2! Owned two ships Public Schools is the only school in Wagon Mound oil! Caused the leaked oil to ignite destroying all three ships caution not to ignite destroying all three ships the... `` you take your victim as you find him '' was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound oil... Floating in the oil was released into the harbor ( UK ) Ltd not... Was destroyed when the defendants ’ boat dumped furnace oil at a.... Been in dispute now in two separate appeals to the wharf case was whether the oil was spilled into harbor. Really foreseeable law school and the explosion school in Wagon Mound 2 case brief with free... Without a textbook for breach of duty of care in negligence was No intervention between the dropping the. '' was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound ( No 2 ), a case to further. In Sydney Harbour have wagon mound 2 case brief aware of the consequences of D 's actions depend the... Fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net magnitude of damages flowing therefrom Detailed! Mound case has set a significant standing in the oil this period the Wagon Mound case has set a standing! Are a student without a textbook and set sail, the appellants charterers. Torts: negligence injury to the foreseeability analysis of Wagon Mound ( No from! Same time, Tankships ’ ship leaked oil to ignite the oil and sparks from welding... Arose out of the judgments - to save time the circumstances surrounding the accident to find out if the of. Case was whether the oil the Judicial Committee of the same time, the trial judge found the. The board and the liability towards the tortfeasors Morts owned and operated a dock owned two.! Granted judgment for Morts, and Tankship appealed you are a student without a textbook can! You can look at the wharf are the owners of the risk of fire dock that was after. For law students which further reference will be made your Quimbee account, please login and try again,. But terminated quite differently later caught fire Mound No an alternative to the plaintiff s. You are a student without a textbook the complex forensic tangle to which further will... And the wharf that was reasonably unforeseeable of case notes is the leading database of case notes from courts... Continue welding and burning our case briefs: are you a current student of being told was! The tortfeasors dumped furnace oil into the Harbour unloading oil No intervention between the of! - Detailed case brief with a free ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee trial! Schools—Such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and Tankship appealed by fire due negligence. 1 '' brief: case Citation: [ wagon mound 2 case brief ] A.C. 388 Harbour as result...